More Thoughts on Being “Incarnational”

Posted: July 26, 2011 in evangelicalism, missions, theology

Ed Stetzer recently finished his final post about the term “incarnational”:

Some will not like the use of the word, but I hope we all agree on what it is we are looking to see the church do: to be in the world, while remaining distinct, with the aim of fulfilling the Great Commission. The use of a word will not make the church more faithful, but neither does abandoning the word. What we need is clear theology giving birth to strong missiology. You see, I don’t think the term “incarnational mission” is likely to weaken the church’s christology. It’s already weak. If anything, emphasizing this idea gives us an opportunity to revisit both incarnation and incarnational.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s